Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Sherlock Jr.

Filmed in 1924 and directed by and starring Buster Keaton, Sherlock Jr. is overall, an entertaining film. I have seen other Keaton films before including The General (1927)  and this one compares very well. I felt this movie lacked the amount of action seen in The General, but it still contained memorable bits of slap stick humor. One scene which especially stuck out in my mind was the scene at the end where Keaton's character is watching the lead actor on the big screen and mimicking his moves. I found this scene delightfully funny because Keaton's girl friend did not seem to notice his glances at the screen, and the scene seemed so casual. The scene sort of just happened as a result of Keaton and his friend being in that particular projection room at that particular moment in time . I liked how that worked out so well. I think the reason I find these older movies particularly humorous is the  fact that they are silent and therefore the actors must work extra hard to convey certain points. In doing so, some of the movements they make can be a little awkward or unusual. Therein lies the humor for me. Bear in mind that I am not poking fun at these timeless classics, merely finding an extra source of amusement within them.

Keaton's Sherlock Jr. is displaying a slapstick comedy. Slapstick is very action oriented. The jokes are centered around a character doing something unusual with their physical environment. The scenes of Keaton riding the motorcycle and sailing the car in the water exemplify slapstick humor.
Contemporary comedies tend to draw laughs more from dialogue oriented jokes. Naturally, this was not possible with silent films. Occasionally contemporary movies will feature a brief scene or two which involves slapstick or visual/site gags, such as in some of Mel Brooks' films. Specifically, in his film Robin Hood Men in Tights, there is a fight scene between Robin Hood and Little John in which both combatants use staffs, and as he fight progresses, the staffs continue to break in half. They continue to fight using one of the halves until eventually the staff is about a quarter of its original size and Robin Hood is able to knock Little John off of the bridge. For the most part however, modern comedies utilize dialogue-based jokes. A few examples of this are the movies Airplane!, and The Jerk. In Airplane!, the scene in which the stewardess is trying to understand what two passengers are saying and an elderly passenger announces “I speak jive”. This type of joke would not be possible with a silent film. Additionally, a slapstick joke would not have carried the same level of humor in the situation. In the Jerk, the scene towards the end of the movie when Steve Martin's character is leaving his house declaring he does need any of his possessions, but he changes his mind as he passes various objects including an ashtray, a paddle game, a remote control, and a chair. Again, this joke would not have carried the same effect if it was in a silent film.



This film also reminded me of another film I have seen which involves a similar concept. Woody Allen's classic The Purple Rose of Cairo. In that film, the plot is reverse of Sherlock Jr., instead of the main character going into the movie that is being shown within the film, the character from the movie within the film enters the real world. Similar humorous antics ensue, and the film is a success. 

7 comments:

  1. Rob,
    I agree with your comment about the actors have to work extra hard to convey humor to the audience since the film is silent and it would be extremely difficult to create humor through dialogue of the cue cards. Although this was the first Buster Keaton film I have seen, I have seen a good amount of Charlie Chaplin films who uses a similar style. I would say that contemporary comedies are more about "sharing" comedy in the form of dialogue rather than "showing" comedy which is what Keaton does in this film by his actions. I think both styles of comedy are extremely amusing as well although I would rather watch a dialogue comedy, so that I could repeat the lines later and share a laugh with other people.

    Best,

    Graham Gilmer

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Graham,

      I have also seen a lot of Chaplin films, and you're right, he does use a similar style. While there are notable differences between Keaton and Chaplin, they both use slapstick as a basis for their jokes. You're right, modern comedies engage the audience more by enabling them to pass the jokes on to their friends. It would be difficult to share Keaton or Chaplin's jokes with friends because you couldn't easily reenact them, so you'd have to explain them, and that would result in the joke losing a little bit of its humor. Part of the humor from these old films is the spontaneity of the actions. If you are explaining the joke to someone, part of the scene may get lost in translation and it would not carry over too well. Visual jokes are best when they are seen, not spoken.

      I agree, I also think both styles of comedy are hilarious. I wholly enjoy slapstick, but I also enjoy deadpan jokes, which can only be achieved using dialogue. Comedy is something that is better when it is shared, and although these older films are indeed funny, they lack the ability to be easily shared, so in a way, they wind up being forgotten. Which is too bad, but luckily there are classes such as this to re-introduce these timeless classics to the world.

      Regards,

      Rob

      Delete
  2. Rob,

    I completely agree with modern films rely on dialogue jokes. I said the same thing in my blog entry. I think if Sherlock Jr had sounds and dialogue, it would have ruined its charm and slapstick completely. However, the movies you mentioned that have both slapstick and dialogue in them are hilarious! While I don't find Sherlock Jr to be as laughable as the Jerk, I find that you cannot help but laugh at Keaton merely because of all the misfortune his character undeservingly receives.

    Thank You for Your Thoughts!

    Nicole

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nicole,

      That's a good point you bring up. If Sherlock Jr. or any of the older silent comedies were able to include sound and dialogue, it would have completely changed the movie. There would have been less need for the slapstick jokes and some of the spontaneity that makes the jokes works may have been lost. I agree, The Jerk, while also a comedy, is in a different league than Sherlock Jr. Both are funny, but for different reasons. It is nice to have variety though, because sometimes slapstick humor is just what you are looking for.

      Best,

      Rob

      Delete
  3. I think you hit the nail on the hammer when you mentioned the scene where Keaton is mimicking the lead actor because i thought that was reminiscent of the scene in the beginning were Keaton was mimicking the guy who sold the watch. I feel like in comedy one of the classics that never seems to get old is when characters mimic other characters. I think this is extremely important in non-talking movies because it allows the audience to feel the hummer without having to hear it. We all know the mimicking that goes on now in movies which usually revolves around saying the something as one of the actors however, with a non-talking film this is a great way to get the same meaning across.

    ReplyDelete

  4. Heather,

    You're right, Keaton did an excellent job making his falls and trips seem random and yet befitting the rest of the action. One thing I like to think about is if a modern actor could integrate seamless slapstick humor into a current movie. If someone decided to make a silent comedy like Sherlock Jr. today, could it be done and retain the charm of these old pictures? I like to think it would be possible, but I don't know who would be a good fit for the part.

    Regards,

    Rob

    ReplyDelete
  5. Rob,

    I agree that the silent films had to work harder to successfully convey humor. Although physical comedy is accessible I’m sure that comedy filmmakers of that era had to constantly re-invent the way they communicated humor (like Keaton).

    -Ssorha

    ReplyDelete